Chapter X: Publication, Access to Proceedings and Non-Disputing Party Submissions

Rule 62: Publication of Awards and Decisions on Annulment

(1) With consent of the parties, the Centre shall publish every Award, supplementary decision on an Award, rectification, interpretation, and revision of an Award, and decision on annulment.

(2) The parties may consent to publication of the full text or to a jointly redacted text of the documents referred to in paragraph (1).

(3) Consent to publish the documents referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to have been given if no party objects in writing to such publication within 60 days after the dispatch of the document.

(4) Absent consent of the parties pursuant to paragraphs (1)-(3), the Centre shall publish excerpts of the documents referred to in paragraph (1). The following procedure shall apply to publication of excerpts:

(a) the Secretary-General shall propose excerpts to the parties within 60 days after the date upon which either party objects to publication or notifies the Secretary-General that the parties disagree on redaction of the document;

(b) the parties may send comments on the proposed excerpts to the Secretary-General within 60 days after their receipt, including whether any information in the proposed excerpts is confidential or protected as defined in Rule 66; and

(c) the Secretary-General shall consider any comments received on the proposed excerpts and publish such excerpts within 30 days after the expiry of the time limit referred to in paragraph (4)(b).

Rule 63: Publication of Orders and Decisions

(1) The Centre shall publish orders and decisions, with any redactions agreed to by the parties and jointly notified to the Secretary-General within 60 days after the order or decision is issued.

(2) If either party notifies the Secretary-General within the 60-day period referred to in paragraph (1) that the parties disagree on any proposed redactions, the Secretary-General shall refer the order or decision to the Tribunal to decide any disputed redactions. The Centre shall publish the order or decision in accordance with the decision of the Tribunal.

(3) In deciding a dispute pursuant to paragraph (2), the Tribunal shall ensure that publication does not disclose any confidential or protected information as defined in Rule 66.

Rule 64: Publication of Documents Filed in the Proceeding

(1) With consent of the parties, the Centre shall publish any written submission or supporting document filed by a party in the proceeding, with any redactions agreed to by the parties and jointly notified to the Secretary-General.

(2) Absent consent of the parties pursuant to paragraph (1), a party may refer to the Tribunal a dispute regarding the redaction of a written submission, excluding supporting documents, that it filed in the proceeding. The Tribunal shall decide any disputed redactions and the Centre shall publish the written submission in accordance with the decision of the Tribunal.

(3) In deciding a dispute pursuant to paragraph (2), the Tribunal shall ensure that publication does not disclose any confidential or protected information as defined in Rule 66.

Rule 65; Observation of Hearings

(1) The Tribunal shall allow persons in addition to the parties, their representatives, witnesses and experts during their testimony, and persons assisting the Tribunal, to observe hearings, unless either party objects.

(2) The Tribunal shall establish procedures to prevent the disclosure of confidential or protected information as defined in Rule 66 to persons observing the hearings.

(3) Upon request of a party, the Centre shall publish recordings or transcripts of hearings, unless the other party objects.

Rule 66: Confidential or Protected Information

For the purposes of Rules 62-65, confidential or protected information is information which is protected from public disclosure:

(a) by the instrument of consent to arbitration;

(b) by the applicable law or applicable rules;

(c) in the case of information of a State party to the dispute, by the law of that State;

(d) in accordance with the orders and decisions of the Tribunal;

(e) by agreement of the parties;

(f) because it constitutes confidential business information or protected personal information;

(g) because public disclosure would impede law enforcement;

(h) because a State party to the dispute considers that public disclosure would be contrary to its essential security interests;

(i) because public disclosure would aggravate the dispute between the parties; or

(j) because public disclosure would undermine the integrity of the arbitral process.

Rule 67: Submission of Non-Disputing Parties

(1) Any person or entity that is not a party to the dispute (“non-disputing party”) may apply for permission to file a written submission in the proceeding. The application shall be made in the procedural language(s) used in the proceeding.

(2) In determining whether to permit a non-disputing party submission, the Tribunal shall consider all relevant circumstances, including:

(a) whether the submission would address a matter within the scope of the dispute;

(b) how the submission would assist the Tribunal to determine a factual or legal issue related to the proceeding by bringing a perspective, particular knowledge or insight that is different from that of the parties;

(c) whether the non-disputing party has a significant interest in the proceeding;

(d) the identity, activities, organization and ownership of the non-disputing party, including any direct or indirect affiliation between the non-disputing party, a party or a non-disputing Treaty Party; and

(e) whether any person or entity will provide the non-disputing party with financial or other assistance to file the submission.

(3) The parties shall have the right to make observations on whether a non-disputing party should be permitted to file a written submission in the proceeding and on any conditions for filing such a submission.

(4) The Tribunal shall ensure that non-disputing party participation does not disrupt the proceeding or unduly burden or unfairly prejudice either party. To this end, the Tribunal may impose conditions on the non-disputing party, including with respect to the format, length, scope or publication of the written submission and the time limit to file the submission.

(5) The Tribunal shall issue a reasoned decision on whether to permit a non-disputing party submission within 30 days after the last written submission on the application.

(6) The Tribunal shall provide the non-disputing party with relevant documents filed in the proceeding, unless either party objects.

(7) If the Tribunal permits a non-disputing party to file a written submission, the parties shall have the right to make observations on the submission.

Rule 68: Participation of Non-Disputing Treaty Party

(1) The Tribunal shall permit a Party to a treaty that is not a party to the dispute (“non-disputing Treaty Party”) to make a submission on the interpretation of the treaty at issue in the dispute and upon which consent to arbitration is based. The Tribunal may, after consulting with the parties, invite a non-disputing Treaty Party to make such a submission.

(2) The Tribunal shall ensure that non-disputing Treaty Party participation does not disrupt the proceeding or unduly burden or unfairly prejudice either party. To this end, the Tribunal may impose conditions on the making of the submission by the non-disputing Treaty Party, including with respect to the format, length, scope or publication of the submission, and the time limit to file the submission.

(3) The Tribunal shall provide the non-disputing Treaty Party with relevant documents filed in the proceeding, unless either party objects.

(4) The parties shall have the right to make observations on the submission of the non-disputing Treaty Party.