Following appointment by the parties, Alfredo Bullard (Peruvian) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator.

The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with the parties’ agreement of May 12, 2017. Its members are: Alfredo Bullard (Peruvian), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; Charles Poncet (Swiss), appointed by the Claimant; and Alexis Mourre (French), appointed by the Respondent.

The Respondent files a request for security for costs.

The Claimant files a memorial on the merits.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request for security for costs.

The Respondent files a reply on the Claimant’s observations of December 22, 2017.

The Claimant files a rejoinder on Respondent’s application for security for costs of November 27, 2017.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning the Respondent’s request for security for costs.

The Respondents files a counter-memorial on the merits and a memorial on jurisdiction.  

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 amending Procedural Order No. 1. 

The Claimant files a counter-memorial on jurisdiction.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning procedural matters.

Each party files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

Each party files observations on the other party’s request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning the procedural calendar.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning production of documents.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning the procedural calendar.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on disclosure of submissions to a third party.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request for the Tribunal to decide on disclosure of submissions to a third party.

The Respondent files further observations on its request for the Tribunal to decide on disclosure of submissions to a third party.

The Claimant files further observations on the Respondent’s request for the Tribunal to decide on disclosure of submissions to a third party.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning the Respondent’s request for the Tribunal to decide on disclosure of submissions to a third party.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 9 concerning the procedural calendar.

The Claimant files a reply on the merits.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 10 concerning the procedural calendar.

The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and a reply on jurisdiction.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 11 concerning the procedural calendar.

The Claimant files a rejoinder on jurisdiction.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 12 concerning the organization of the hearing.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Tribunal decides on the Claimant’s request of May 28, 2019.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Tribunal decides on the Claimant’s request of May 31, 2019.

The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in Washington, D.C.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 13 concerning procedural matters. 

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 14 concerning procedural matters. 

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 15 concerning the procedural calendar. 

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 16 concerning the procedural calendar.

Each party files a post-hearing brief.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 17 concerning the organization of the hearing. 

The Respondent files a request for the exclusion of evidence.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request for the exclusion of evidence.

The Respondent files observations on its request for the exclusion of evidence.

The Claimant files further observations on the Respondent’s request for the exclusion of evidence.

The Tribunal issues a decision concerning the Respondent’s request for the exclusion of evidence

The Tribunal holds a hearing in Paris.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 18 concerning the procedural calendar.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 19 concerning the procedural calendar.

Each party files a submission on costs.

The Tribunal declares the proceeding closed in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 38(1).

The Tribunal renders its award; attached to the award is a dissenting opinion by arbitrator Charles Poncet and additional declaration of President Alfredo Bullard and Arbitrator Alexis Mourre.

The Secretary-General registers an application for partial annulment of the award filed by Dominion Minerals Corp. 

The ad hoc Committee is constituted in accordance with Article 52(3) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Toby Landau (British), President; Loretta Malintoppi (Italian); and Dyalá Jiménez Figueres (Costa Rican); all members appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council.

The Respondent files preliminary objections pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41(5) and a request for the stay of enforcement of the award.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request for the stay of enforcement of the award.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s preliminary objections pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41(5). 

The ad hoc Committee holds a first session by videoconference.

The ad hoc Committee issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters.

The Republic of Panama files a reply on Dominion Minerals’ Corp. observations of July 29, 2021.

Dominion Minerals Corp. files a rejoinder to Panama’s preliminary objections pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41(5).

Dominion Minerals Corp. files a memorial on partial annulment. 

The ad hoc Committee issues a decision on the stay of enforcement of the award and a decision on the Republic of Panama’s preliminary objections pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41(5).

The Republic of Panama files a counter-memorial on partial annulment. 

Dominion Minerals Corp. files a reply on partial annulment.

The Republic of Panama files a rejoinder on partial annulment.