Following appointment by the Respondent, Alain Pellet (France) accepts his appointment as arbitrator.

Following appointment by agreement of the parties, Wendy J. Miles (New Zealand) accepts her appointment as presiding arbitrator.

The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(a) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Wendy J. Miles (New Zealand), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; Francisco Orrego Vicuña (Chilean), appointed by the Claimant; and Alain Pellet (French), appointed by the Respondent.

Following the resignation of Wendy Miles, Teresa Cheng (Chinese) accepts her appointment as President of the Tribunal, appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 11(1).

The Tribunal is reconstituted. Its members are: Teresa Cheng (Chinese), President, appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 11(1); Francisco Orrego Vicuña (Chilean), appointed by the Claimant; and Alain Pellet (French) appointed by the Respondent. The proceeding is resumed pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 12.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning the non-disputing party’s application to file a written submission pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).

The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits.

Following the resignation of arbitrator Teresa Cheng, the Secretary-General notifies the parties of the vacancy on the Tribunal and the proceeding is suspended pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 10(2).

Following the resignation of Teresa Cheng, Bernard Hanotiau (Belgian) accepts his appointment as President of the Tribunal, appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 11(1).

The Tribunal is reconstituted. Its members are Bernard Hanotiau (Belgian), President, appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 11(1); Francisco Orrego Vicuña (Chilean), appointed by the Claimant; and Alain Pellet (French) appointed by the Respondent. The proceeding is resumed pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 12.

Following exchanges between the parties, each party files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning production of documents.

The Respondent files a request for leave to raise a new jurisdictional objection.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of April 23, 2018.

The Tribunal issues Procedural order No. 5 concerning the Respondent’s request for leave to raise a new jurisdictional objection.

The Claimant files a reply on the merits.

Following the passing away of arbitrator Francisco Orrego Vicuña (Chilean), the Secretary-General notifies the parties of the vacancy on the Tribunal and the proceeding is suspended pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 10(2).

Following the passing away of arbitrator Francisco Orrego Vicuña, Sabine Konrad (German) appointed by the Claimant, accepts her appointment as arbitrator in accordance with ICSID Rule 11(1).

The Tribunal is reconstituted. Its members are: Bernard Hanotiau (Belgian), President, appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 11(1); Sabine Konrad (German), appointed by the Claimant; and Alain Pellet (French), appointed by the Respondent. The proceeding is resumed pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 12.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Respondent files a response to the Claimant’s observations of December 7, 2018.

A non-disputing party files an application for leave to intervene, to file written submissions, have access to documents, and participate in hearings.

The Claimant files a response to the Respondent’s observations of December 12, 2018.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning production of documents.

Each party files observations on the non-disputing party’s application.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning the non-disputing party’s application to file a written submission pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).

The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on additional production of documents.

The Respondent files its observations on the Claimant’s additional production of documents request.

The Claimant files a response to the Respondent’s observations of March 6, 2019.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning the organization of the hearing.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 9 concerning additional production of documents.

The Claimant files a rejoinder on jurisdiction.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents pursuant to Procedural Order No. 4.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of March 15, 2019.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of March 20, 2019.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of March 25, 2019.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 10 concerning the admissibility of new evidence.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 11 concerning the production of documents pursuant to Procedural Order No. 4.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 12 concerning the admissibility of new evidence.

The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in Washington, D.C. 

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of May 20, 2019.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 13 concerning the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files a request for the exclusion of evidence.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request for the exclusion of evidence.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 14 concerning the exclusion of evidence.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on additional production of documents.

The Tribunal decides on production of documents.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 15 concerning the organization of the hearing.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Tribunal holds a hearing on quantum in London.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of October 4, 2019.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 16 concerning the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of November 14, 2019.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 17 concerning the admissibility of new evidence.

Each party files a post-hearing brief.

The Respondent files a request to address the arguments raised by the Claimant in its post-hearing brief.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of February 13, 2020.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 18 concerning the Respondent’s request of February 13, 2020, and poses questions to the parties.

Each party files answers to the questions posed by the Tribunal on February 23, 2020.

Each party files a submission on costs.

The Tribunal declares the proceeding closed in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 38(1).

The Tribunal reopens the proceeding, pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 38(2).

The Tribunal poses questions to the parties.

Each party files answers to the questions posed by the Tribunal on September 3, 2021.

The Tribunal declares the proceeding closed in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 38(1).

The Tribunal renders its award; attached to the award is a separate opinion by arbitrator Sabine Konrad.