Case Details
UAB "ARVI" ir ko and UAB "SANITEX" v. Republic of Serbia (ICSID Case No. ARB/09/21)
-
Fertilizer plant
-
Other Industry
-
BIT Serbia - Lithuania 2005, BIT Lithuania - Montenegro 2005
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
UAB "ARVI" ir ko (Lithuanian), UAB "SANITEX" (Lithuanian)
-
Republic of Serbia (Serbian)
-
December 18, 2009
-
June 29, 2010
-
Thomas BUERGENTHAL (U.S.) - Appointed by Co-Arbitrators
-
Charles N. BROWER (U.S.) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Tibor VARADY (Serbian) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Bernotas & Dominas Glimstedt, Vilnius, Lithuania
Hughes Hubbard & Reed, Paris, France -
Miroslav Paunovic, Radomir Milosevic, Milos Zivkovic, Belgrade, Serbia
Predrag Cvetkovic, Nis, Serbia
Public Attorney of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
Sanja Djajic, Novi Sad, Serbia -
English
-
Concluded
-
March 16, 2015 - The Tribunal decides on the Claimants’ request of March 13, 2015.
The Tribunal renders its award; attached to the award is a separate opinion by arbitrator Charles N. Brower.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
December 18, 2009 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
May 5, 2010 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Tibor Varady (Serbian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
May 5, 2010 | Following appointment by the Claimants, Charles N. Brower (U.S.) accepts his appointment as arbitrator |
June 25, 2010 | Following appointment by the co-arbitrators, Thomas Buergenthal (U.S.) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
June 29, 2010 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(a) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Thomas Buergenthal (U.S.), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; Charles N. Brower (U.S.), appointed by the Claimants; and Tibor Varady (Serbian), appointed by the Respondent. |
September 14, 2010 | The Tribunal holds a first session by telephone conference. |
February 15, 2011 | The Claimants file a memorial on the merits. |
July 6, 2011 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on jurisdiction and the merits. |
September 9, 2011 | The Claimants file a counter-memorial on jurisdiction. |
November 9, 2011 | The Respondent files a reply on jurisdiction. |
January 12, 2012 | The Claimants file a rejoinder on jurisdiction. |
April 30, 2012 | The Tribunal issues a procedural order concerning the procedural calendar. |
May 11, 2012 | The parties file simultaneously request for production of documents. |
June 1, 2012 | The parties file simultaneously replies to objections for production of documents. |
July 12, 2012 | The Tribunal issues a procedural order concerning production of documents. |
November 2, 2012 | The Claimants file a reply on the merits. |
March 1, 2013 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits. |
April 23, 2013 | The Claimants request permission from the Tribunal to file new evidence. |
April 29, 2013 | The Tribunal decides on the Claimants' request of April 23, 2013. |
July 24, 2013 - July 26, 2013 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in Paris. |
October 8, 2013 | Each party files a post-hearing brief. |
October 18, 2013 | Each party files a statement of costs. |
August 18, 2014 | The Tribunal poses questions to the parties. |
August 25, 2014 | The Claimants file answers to the questions posed by the Tribunal on August 18, 2014. |
August 26, 2014 | The Respondent files answers to the questions posed by the Tribunal on August 18, 2014. |
September 17, 2014 | The Tribunal declares the proceeding closed in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 38(1). |
March 13, 2015 | The Claimants file a request to reopen the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 38(2). |
March 16, 2015 | The Tribunal decides on the Claimants’ request of March 13, 2015. The Tribunal renders its award; attached to the award is a separate opinion by arbitrator Charles N. Brower. |