Case Details
PowerChina HuaDong Engineering Corporation and China Railway 18th Bureau Group Company Ltd v. Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (ICSID Case No. ADM/23/1)
-
Construction project
-
Construction
-
BIT Vietnam - China 1992
-
Ad Hoc
-
PowerChina HuaDong Engineering Corporation (Chinese), China Railway 18th Bureau Group Company Ltd (Chinese)
-
Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (Vietnamese)
-
February 1, 2023
-
April 26, 2023
-
Jean Engelmayer KALICKI (U.S.) - Appointed by Co-Arbitrators
-
John BEECHEY (British) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Rolf KNIEPER (German) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Toby Landau, Singapore
Chester Brown, Sydney, Australia
Rachel Low, Singapore
Fenwick Elliott, London, U.K. -
Ministry of Justice, Hà Nội City, Vietnam
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Hà Nội City, Vietnam
Peter & Kim, Geneva, Switzerland, Seoul, South Korea, Singapore and Sydney, Australia
IDVN Lawyers, Hà Nội City, Vietnam -
English
-
Pending
-
December 6, 2024 - Following exchanges between the parties, each party files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
February 5, 2023 | Following appointment by the Claimants, John Beechey (British) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
February 5, 2023 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Rolf Knieper (German) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
April 24, 2023 | Following appointment by her co-arbitrators pursuant to the parties’ agreement, Jean E. Kalicki (U.S.) accepts her appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
April 26, 2023 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with ICSID Additional Facility Rule 29. Its members are: Jean E. Kalicki (U.S.), President, appointed by her co-arbitrators pursuant to the parties’ agreement; John Beechey (British), appointed by the Claimants; and Rolf Knieper (German), appointed by the Respondent. |
August 15, 2023 | The Tribunal holds a first session by video conference. |
August 28, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
August 28, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning confidentiality. |
December 8, 2023 | The Claimants file a memorial on the merits. |
January 31, 2024 | The Respondent files a request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question pursuant to Rule 54 of the Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules. |
March 15, 2024 | The Claimants files observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
April 15, 2024 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning the Respondent’s request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question; as a result, the objections to jurisdiction are joined to the merits of the dispute. |
September 27, 2024 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and a memorial on jurisdiction. |
December 6, 2024 | Following exchanges between the parties, each party files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |