Following appointment by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with Article 38 of the ICSID Convention, Eduardo Zuleta-Jaramillo (Colombian) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator.

The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(a) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Eduardo Zuleta-Jaramillo (Colombian), President, appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with Article 38 of the ICSID Convention; Guido Santiago Tawil (Argentine), appointed by Claimant; and Pierre-Marie Dupuy (French), appointed by Respondent.

The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and a memorial on jurisdiction.

Following exchanges between the parties, each party files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning production of documents.

The Claimant files a reply on the merits and a counter-memorial on jurisdiction.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to allow Respondent’s experts a site visit.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of June 27, 2018.

The Claimant files further observations on the Respondent’s request of June 27, 2018.

The Respondent files further observations on its request of June 27, 2018.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning a site visit.

The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and a reply on jurisdiction.

The Respondent files a proposal for disqualification of arbitrator Eduardo Zuleta Jaramillo. The proceeding is suspended in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 9(6).

The Claimant files observations on the proposal for disqualification.

The arbitrator furnishes explanations regarding the proposal for disqualification in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 9(3).

Each party files further observations on the proposal for disqualification.

The proposal for disqualification of arbitrator Eduardo Zuleta Jaramillo is declined by the co-arbitrators. The proceeding is resumed pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 9(6).

A non-disputing party files an application pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning procedural matters.

The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by telephone conference.

The Claimant files a rejoinder on jurisdiction.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning procedural matters.

Each party files observations on the non-disputing party’s application.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning the non-disputing party’s application of September 21, 2018.

A non-disputing party files a request for reconsideration of the Tribunal’s Procedural Order No. 7 dated November 21, 2018.

Each party files observations on the non-disputing party’s request of November 28, 2018.

The Tribunal issues a decision on the non-disputing party’s request for reconsideration of the Tribunal’s Procedural Order No. 7 dated November 21, 2018.

The non-disputing party’s written submission filed pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2) is admitted into the record of the proceeding.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of a new document.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of December 5, 2018.

The Respondent files further observations to its request of December 5, 2018.

The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in Washington, D.C.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning the Respondent’s request of December 5, 2018.

The Respondent files a request for reconsideration of the Tribunal’s Procedural Order No. 8 dated January 15, 2019.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request for reconsideration of January 18, 2019.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 9 concerning the Respondent’s request for reconsideration of January 18, 2019.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of a new document.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of February 1, 2019.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 10 concerning procedural matters.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of a new document.

Each party files a post-hearing brief.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of March 15, 2019.

The Respondent files further observations to its request of March 15, 2019.

The Claimant files further observations on the Respondent’s request of March 15, 2019.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 11 concerning the Respondent’s request of March 15, 2019.

The Respondent files a request for reconsideration of the Tribunal’s Procedural Order No. 11 dated March 27, 2019.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of April 2, 2019.

The Respondent files further observations to its request of April 2, 2019.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 12 concerning the Respondent’s request of April 2, 2019.

Each party files a reply post-hearing brief.

Each party files observations on documents added to the record.

Each party files further observations on documents added to the record.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new documents.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of June 10, 2019.

Each party files observations on documents added to the record.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new documents.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of December 4, 2019.

The Tribunal issues a decision on the admissibility of new documents.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of a new document.

The Tribunal issues a decision on the admissibility of a new document.

The Claimant informs the Tribunal of a new fact.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s communication of February 4, 2020.

The Claimant files a response to the Respondent’s observations of February 12, 2020.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s response of February 20, 2020.

The Tribunal poses questions to the parties.

The Claimant files answers to the questions posed by the Tribunal on February 27, 2020.

The Respondent files answers to the questions posed by the Tribunal on February 27, 2020.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of a new document.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of June 16, 2020.

The Tribunal issues a decision on the admissibility of a new document.

The Tribunal issues a decision on jurisdiction, liability and directions on quantum; attached to the decision is a dissenting opinion by arbitrator Pierre-Marie Dupuy.

Each party files a memorandum by their respective experts identifying areas of agreement and disagreement on issues of quantum.

The Tribunal issues a supplementary decision to its decision of October 8, 2020.

Each party files a submission on quantum.

The Tribunal declares the proceeding closed in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 38(1).

Each party files a statement of costs.

The Tribunal renders its award.

The Acting Secretary-General registers an application for annulment of the award filed by the Kingdom of Spain and notifies the parties of the provisional stay of enforcement of the award.

The ad hoc Committee is constituted in accordance with Article 52(3) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Eva Kalnina (Latvian), President; Milton Estuardo Argueta Pinto (Guatemalan); and Ricardo Vásquez Urra (Chilean); all members appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council.

The Kingdom of Spain files a request to continue the stay of enforcement of the award.

STEAG GmbH files observations on the Kingdom of Spain’s request to continue the stay of enforcement of the award.

The ad hoc Committee holds a first session by video conference.

The ad hoc Committee issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters.

The Kingdom of Spain files a request for the ad hoc Committee to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Kingdom of Spain files a reply on the request to continue the stay of enforcement of the award.

STEAG GmbH files observations on the Kingdom of Spain’s request of May 27, 2022.

STEAG GmbH files a rejoinder on the request to continue the stay of enforcement of the award.

The ad hoc Committee decides on the Kingdom of Spain’s request of May 27, 2022.

The ad hoc Committee issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning the admissibility of new evidence.

The Kingdom of Spain files a memorial on annulment.

The ad hoc Committee issues its decision on the request for continuation of the stay of enforcement of the award, with reasons to follow.  

The ad hoc Committee issues its reasoned decision on the request for continuation of the stay of enforcement of the award.

STEAG GmbH files a counter-memorial on annulment.

STEAG GmbH files a request to terminate the stay of enforcement of the award.

The Kingdom of Spain files observations on STEAG GmbH’s request to terminate the stay of enforcement of the award.

The ad hoc Committee issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning the admissibility of new evidence.

The ad hoc Committee issues a decision concerning the termination of the stay of enforcement of the award.

The Kingdom of Spain files a reply on annulment.

A non-disputing party files an application to file a written submission pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).

Each Party files observations on the non-disputing party’s application.

The ad hoc Committee issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning the admissibility of evidence.

STEAG GmbH files a rejoinder on annulment.

The ad hoc Committee issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning the organization of the Hearing.

The ad hoc Committee decides on the non-disputing party’s application pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).

The ad hoc Committee holds a hearing on annulment in Washington, D.C.

Each party files a post-hearing brief.

Each party files a submission on costs.

The ad hoc Committee issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning the non-disputing party’s application pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).

The Kingdom of Spain files a request for the Committee to decide on the admissibility of a new document.

STEAG GmbH files observations on the Kingdom of Spain’s request of March 25, 2024.

The ad hoc Committee issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning the request of March 25, 2024.

The Kingdom of Spain files a request for the ad hoc Committee to decide on the admissibility of new documents.

STEAG GmbH files observations on the Kingdom of Spain’s request of July 10, 2024. 

The ad hoc Committee issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning the request of July 10, 2024.

The ad hoc Committee declares the proceeding closed in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rules 53 and 38(1).

The ad hoc Committee issues its decision on annulment.