Prof. Hugo Perezcano Diaz

Prof. Hugo Perezcano Diaz

Languages

  • English
  • French
  • Spanish

ICSID Panel Designation

Designation/Role Designated By Designation Date
No Records To Display

Professional Experience

Name Of Company / Organization City Job Title Date
Name Of Company / OrganizationIndependent Consultancy / Private Law Practice CityMexico City Job TitleAttorney and International Trade Consultant Date11/2011 - Present
Name Of Company / OrganizationEscuela Libre de Derecho / International Chamber of Commerce CityMexico City Job TitleProfessor of the course “Dispute Settlement between States and between and investor and a State” Date11/2000 - Present
Name Of Company / OrganizationMinistry of Economy of Mexico CityMexico City Job TitleHead of the Unit of International Trade Practices Date01/2007 - 10/2011
Name Of Company / OrganizationMinistry of Economy of Mexico CityMexico City Job TitleGeneral Counsel for International Trade Negotiations Date12/1994 - 12/2006
Name Of Company / OrganizationMinistry of Trade and Industrial Promotion of Mexico (now Ministry of Economy) CityMexico City Job TitleDirector of Legal Analysis Date03/1993/12/1994 -
Name Of Company / OrganizationMinistry of Trade and Industrial Promotion (now Ministry of Economy) CityMexico City Job TitleDeputy Director of Legal Analysis Date03/1992 - 03/1993
Name Of Company / OrganizationGrupo Impulsora CityMexico City Job TitleLegal Counsel Date09/1991 - 03/1993
Name Of Company / OrganizationSantamarina y Steta, S.C. City Job TitleLegal Intern Date10/1989 - 09/1991
Name Of Company / OrganizationInstituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (Monterrey Institute of Technology and Advanced Studies CityMexico City Job TitleProfessor of the course “NAFTA and other Trade Agreements” Date2004 -
Name Of Company / OrganizationUniversidad Iberoamericana, International Business Master Program City Job TitleProfessor of International Trade Law Date2002 -

Education and Professional Qualifications

Institution City Degree/Qualification Date
InstitutionThe United mexican States CityMexico City Degree/QualificationLicense to Practise Law Date1992
InstitutionInstituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (Mexico’s Autonomous Institute of CityMexico City Degree/QualificationLaw Date1987 - 1991

Experience in ICSID Proceedings

Case Name Type Role (Appt'd by)
Case NameAngel Samuel Seda and others v. Republic of Colombia (ICSID Case No. ARB/19/6) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Co-arbitrator (Resp.)
Case NameGustavo Maeso Lando v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/19/2) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Co-arbitrator (Resp.)
Case NameVento Motorcycles, Inc. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/17/3) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Co-arbitrator (Resp.)
Case NameElecnor S.A. and Isolux Corsán Concesiones S.A. v. Republic of Peru TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)President (parties)
Case NameBayview Irrigation District and others v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/05/1) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel (Resp.)
Case NameCargill, Incorporated v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/05/2) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel (Resp.)
Case NameArcher Daniels Midland Company and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/04/5) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel (Resp.)
Case NameGemplus, S.A., SLP, S.A. and Gemplus Industrial, S.A. de C.V. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/04/3) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel (Resp.)
Case NameCorn Products International, Inc. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/04/1) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel (Resp.)
Case NameFireman's Fund Insurance Company v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/02/1) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel (Resp.)
Case NameWaste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/3) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel (Resp.)
Case NameTécnicas Medioambientales Tecmed, S.A. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel (Resp.)
Case NameADF Group Inc. v. United States of America (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel
Case NameMondev International Ltd. v. United States of America (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/2) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel
Case NameMarvin Roy Feldman Karpa v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/1) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel (Resp.)
Case NameThe Loewen Group, Inc. and Raymond L. Loewen v. United States of America (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel
Case NameWaste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/2) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel (Resp.)
Case NameRobert Azinian and others v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/2) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel (Resp.)
Case NameMetalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1) TypeArbitration Role (Appt'd by)Counsel (Resp.)

Professional Membership

No Records To Display

Publications

  • “Transparency in International Dispute Settlement Proceedings on Trade and Investment” in Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes. ed. pos Karl P. Sauvant and Michael Chiswick-Patterson, Oxford University Press, New York, 2008, pp. 193-200.
  • “Los Tratados Internacionales en el Orden Jurídico Mexicano” in Bernado Sepúlveda, Juez de la Corte Internacional de Justicia. Gustavo Vega Cánovas, Coord.; El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Internacionales, Mexico City, 2007, pp. 125-189.
  • “Los Tratados Internacionales en el Orden Jurídico Mexicano” in Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, Vol. VII, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM, Mexico City, 2007, pp. 249-279.
  • “Damages in investor-state arbitration: applicable law and burden of proof” in Evaluation of Damages in International Arbitration. Ed. International Chamber of Commerce, ed. pos. Yves Derains y Richard Kreindler, Dossiers ICC Institute of World Business Law, Vol. IV, Paris, 2006, pp. 113-132.
  • “Transparency, Amicus Curiae Briefs and Third Party Rights”. Comments made at the 10th Geneva Global Arbitration Forum, in The Journal of World Investment and Trade. Vol. 5, No. 2, Werner Publishing Company, Geneva, February 2004, pp. 347-348.
  • “Is it Now Time for a Multilateral Investment Agreement?” Comments made at the 10th Geneva Global Arbitration Forum, in The Journal of World Investment and Trade. Vol. 5 No. 1, Werner Publishing Company, Geneva, February 2004, pp. 101-103.
  • “Investment Protection Agreements: Should a Multilateral Approach be Reconsidered?” in The Journal of World Investment. Vol. 4, No. 6, Werner Publishing Company, Geneva, December 2003, pp. 929-939.
  • “Investor-State Arbitration. A New Dynamic, Not a New Dimension” in Newsletter of Committee D (Arbitration and ADR) of the International Bar Association Section on Business Law, Vol. 6, Nº 1, June 2001, pp. 40-43.
  • “El arbitraje a nivel internacional y dentro del marco del TLC” in El arbitraje en las relaciones de consumo. Procuraduría Federal del Consumidor (Los Libros del Consumidor), México, D.F., 1997, pp. 85-98.
  • “Government Procurement” in Mexican Law: A Treatise For Legal Practitioners and International Investors. Vol. 1, chapter 15, West Group, St. Paul, Minn., 1998, pp. 543-548.
  • “¿Son los páneles establecidos conforme al Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte autoridades para los efectos del juicio de amparo?” in Revista de Derecho Privado. No. 27, Mc Graw Hill and Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM, Mexico City 1998, pp. 211-232. Also in Documentos de Trabajo. No. 2, Secretaría de Comercio y Fomento Industrial, Mexico City, 1998).
  • “La solución de controversias en el marco del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte” in El futuro del libre comercio en el continente americano. Análisis y perspectiva. UNAM, México, D.F., 1997, pp. 277-299.

Disclaimer

The information in this form has been provided by the relevant arbitrator/conciliator. Every effort is made to ensure it is accurate and current. However, persons relying on this information must conduct their own due diligence research.

Last Updated: February 25, 2020