Case Details
Sacyr S.A. v. Republic of Panama (ICSID Case No. UNCT/18/6)
-
Engineering and construction Services
-
Construction
-
BIT Panama - Spain 1997
-
UNCITRAL
-
Sacyr S.A. (Spanish)
-
Republic of Panama (Panamanian)
-
August 3, 2018
-
May 9, 2019
-
John BEECHEY (British) - Appointed by the Parties
-
Horacio A. GRIGERA NAÓN (Argentine) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Zachary DOUGLAS (Australian, Swiss) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Three Crowns, London, U.K. and Paris, France
-
Ministry of Economy and Finances, Panama, Republic of Panama
Foley Hoag, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
Arnold & Porter, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. -
Pending
-
August 21, 2023 - The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning production of documents.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
January 7, 2019 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Zachary Douglas (Australian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
January 8, 2019 | Following appointment by the Claimant, Horacio Grigera-Naon (Argentine) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
May 9, 2019 | Following appointment by agreement of the parties, John Beechey (British) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
May 9, 2019 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976). Its members are: John Beechey (British), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; Horacio Grigera-Naon (Argentine), appointed by the Claimant; and Zachary Douglas (Australian), appointed by the Respondent. |
September 10, 2019 | The Tribunal issues the Terms of Appointment and Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
October 25, 2019 | The Claimant files its initial submission on jurisdiction and admissibility. |
January 17, 2020 | The Respondent files its memorial on jurisdiction and admissibility. |
April 17, 2020 | The Claimant files its counter-memorial on jurisdiction and admissibility |
September 8, 2020 | Following exchanges between the parties, the Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
September 25, 2020 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning production of documents. |
October 2, 2020 | The Respondent files a reply on jurisdiction and admissibility. |
December 24, 2020 | Following exchanges between the parties, the Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
January 15, 2021 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
January 27, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 regarding production of documents. |
March 5, 2021 | The Claimant files its rejoinder on jurisdiction and admissibility. |
June 1, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning procedural matters. |
June 2, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
September 20, 2021 - September 22, 2021 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction by video conference. |
January 29, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning procedural matters. |
February 3, 2022 | The Tribunal issues a decision on a preliminary issue. |
September 30, 2022 | The Claimant files a memorial on the merits. |
April 28, 2023 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and a memorial on jurisdiction and admissibility. |
July 25, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning production of documents. |
August 21, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning production of documents. |