Case Details
Mehmet Zeki Obuz and others v. Republic of Uzbekistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/32)
-
Food products enterprise
-
Other Industry
-
BIT Türkiye - Uzbekistan 1992
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
Mehmet Zeki Obuz (Turkish), Sevde Yilmaz (Turkish), Huriye Obuz (Turkish), Tasfiye Halinde Obuzlar Gida, Temizlik Maddeleri, Züccaciye ve Tekstil Sanayi Ticaret Limited Sirketi (Turkish)
-
Republic of Uzbekistan (Uzbek)
-
June 4, 2021
-
February 15, 2022
-
Lawrence BOO (Singaporean) - Appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council
-
Eric SCHWARTZ (French, U.S.) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Makhdoom Ali KHAN (Pakistani) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Akinci Law Office, Istanbul, Turkey
-
Minister of Justice, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt and Mosle, Washington D.C., U.S.A. and Brussels, Belgium -
English
-
Pending
-
November 25, 2024 -
Each party files observations on the other party’s submission on costs.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
June 4, 2021 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
August 28, 2021 | Following appointment by the Claimants, Eric Schwartz (French/U.S.) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
September 2, 2021 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Makhdoom Ali Khan (Pakistani) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
February 15, 2022 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(b) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Lawrence Boo (Singaporean), President, appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with Article 38 of the ICSID Convention; Eric Schwartz (French/U.S.), appointed by the Claimants; and Makhdoom Ali Khan (Pakistani), appointed by the Respondent. |
February 15, 2022 | Following appointment by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with Article 38 of the ICSID Convention, Lawrence Boo (Singaporean) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
March 31, 2022 | The Tribunal holds a first session by video conference. |
April 4, 2022 | The Respondent files a request for security for costs. |
April 4, 2022 | The Claimants file a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
April 4, 2022 | The Respondent files a request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
April 11, 2022 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimants’ request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
April 11, 2022 | The Claimants file observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
April 11, 2022 | The Claimants file observations on the Respondent’s request for security for costs. |
April 19, 2022 | The Tribunal issues a decision on production of documents and the Respondent’s request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
April 25, 2022 | The Tribunal holds a case management conference with the parties by video conference. |
May 5, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
September 29, 2022 | The Claimants file a memorial on the merits. |
December 28, 2022 | The Respondent files a renewed request for security for costs. |
January 13, 2023 | The Claimants file observations on the Respondent’s renewed request for security for costs. |
February 6, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning security for costs. |
March 30, 2023 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and a memorial on jurisdiction. |
May 25, 2023 | Following exchanges between the parties, each party files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
June 15, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning production of documents. |
September 28, 2023 | The Claimants file a reply on the merits and a counter-memorial on jurisdiction. |
February 1, 2024 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and a reply on jurisdiction. |
February 20, 2024 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning the procedural calendar. |
February 29, 2024 | The Claimants file a rejoinder on jurisdiction. |
March 29, 2024 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on admissibility of aspects of the Claimants’ rejoinder on jurisdiction. |
April 5, 2024 | The Claimants file observations on the Respondent’s request of March 29, 2024. |
April 12, 2024 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning the Respondent’s request of March 29, 2024. |
May 30, 2024 | The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by video conference. |
June 6, 2024 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
July 1, 2024 - July 10, 2024 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in Washington, D.C.. |
October 25, 2024 | Each party files a post-hearing brief. |
November 15, 2024 | Each party files a submission on costs. |
November 25, 2024 | Each party files observations on the other party’s submission on costs. |