Case Details
APG SGA SA and D.O.O. za promet i usluge Alma Quattro Beograd v. Republic of Serbia (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/13)
-
Advertising enterprise
-
Information & Communication
-
BIT Serbia - Switzerland 2005
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
APG SGA SA (Swiss), D.O.O. za promet i usluge Alma Quattro Beograd (Serbian)
-
Republic of Serbia (Serbian)
-
March 17, 2021
-
October 15, 2021
-
Wendy J. MILES (New Zealand) - Appointed by the Parties
-
John M. TOWNSEND (U.S.) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Maxi SCHERER (German) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Schönherr Rechtsanwälte, Vienna, Austria
Moravcevic Vojnovic i Partneri, Belgrade, Serbia -
Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
Omnia Strategy, London, U.K.
Lucas Bastin, London, U.K.
Law Office Andelkovic, Belgrade, Serbia
State Attorney of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia -
English
-
Pending
-
August 23, 2024 - Each party files a submission on costs.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
| Date | Development |
|---|---|
| March 17, 2021 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
| June 1, 2021 | Following appointment by the Claimants, John M. Townsend (U.S.) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
| July 31, 2021 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Maxi Scherer (German) accepts her appointment as arbitrator. |
| October 15, 2021 | Following appointment by agreement of the parties, Wendy Miles (New Zealand) accepts her appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
| October 15, 2021 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(a) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Wendy Miles (New Zealand), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; John M. Townsend (U.S.), appointed by the Claimants; and Maxi Scherer (German), appointed by the Respondent. |
| December 3, 2021 | The Tribunal holds a first session by video conference. |
| January 4, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
| April 8, 2022 | The Claimants file a memorial on the merits. |
| May 20, 2022 | The Respondent files a request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
| July 1, 2022 | The Claimants’ file observations on the Respondent’s requests to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
| August 12, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning the Respondent’s requests to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question; as a result, the objections to jurisdiction are joined to the merits of the dispute. |
| November 18, 2022 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and a memorial on jurisdiction and admissibility. |
| December 9, 2022 | The Parties file requests for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
| February 10, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning production of documents. |
| May 25, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning production of documents. |
| May 26, 2023 | The Claimants file a reply on the merits. |
| October 16, 2023 | The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by video conference. |
| October 23, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
| November 6, 2023 - November 10, 2023 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and merits. |
| February 28, 2024 | The Claimants file a post-hearing brief. |
| May 10, 2024 | The Respondent files a post-hearing brief. |
| June 28, 2024 | The Claimants file a reply post-hearing brief. |
| August 2, 2024 | The Respondent files a reply post-hearing brief. |
| August 23, 2024 | Each party files a submission on costs. |

