Case Details
Quanta Services Netherlands B.V. v. Republic of Peru (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/1)
-
Telecommunications enterprise
-
Information & Communication
-
BIT Netherlands - Peru 1994
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
Quanta Services Netherlands B.V. (Dutch)
-
Republic of Peru (Peruvian)
-
January 4, 2021
-
May 11, 2021
-
Jean Engelmayer KALICKI (U.S.) - Appointed by the Parties
-
Elisabeth ELJURI (Kittitian/Nevisian, Venezuelan) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Mónica PINTO (Argentine) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
King & Spalding, Houston, TX and New York, NY, U.S.A.
Miranda & Amado, Lima, Peru -
Comisión Especial que Representa a la República del Perú en Controversias Internacionales de Inversión, Lima, Peru
Foley Hoag, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
J&A Garrigues Perú S. Civil de R. L. -
English,Spanish
-
Pending
-
October 7, 2023 - The Respondent files a post-hearing brief.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
January 4, 2021 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
March 17, 2021 | Following appointment by the Claimant, Elisabeth Eljuri (Venezuelan and Kittitian/Nevisian) accepts her appointment as arbitrator. |
April 1, 2021 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Mónica Pinto (Argentine) accepts her appointment as arbitrator. |
May 10, 2021 | Following appointment by agreement of the parties, Jean Engelmayer Kalicki (U.S.) accepts her appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
May 11, 2021 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(b) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Jean Engelmayer Kalicki (U.S.), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; Elisabeth Eljuri (Venezuelan and Kittitian/Nevisian), appointed by the Claimant; and Mónica Pinto (Argentine), appointed by the Respondent. |
July 14, 2021 | The Tribunal holds a first session by video conference. |
August 4, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
December 6, 2021 | The Claimant files a memorial on the merits. |
April 9, 2022 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and a memorial on jurisdiction. |
May 24, 2022 | Following exchanges between the parties, each party files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
June 3, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning production of documents. |
August 1, 2022 | The Claimant files a reply on the merits and counter-memorial on jurisdiction. |
November 15, 2022 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and a reply on jurisdiction. |
December 23, 2022 | The Claimant files a rejoinder on jurisdiction. |
April 11, 2023 | The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by video conference. |
April 26, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
June 5, 2023 - June 15, 2023 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in person in Washington, D.C. and by video conference. |
July 12, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 posing questions to the parties. |
August 14, 2023 | The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
August 18, 2023 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of August 14, 2023. |
August 21, 2023 | The Tribunal decides on the Claimant’s request of August 14, 2023. |
October 6, 2023 | The Claimant files a post-hearing brief. |
October 7, 2023 | The Respondent files a post-hearing brief. |