Case Details
Ahron G. Frenkel v. Republic of Croatia (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/49)
-
Real estate projects
-
Tourism
-
BIT Croatia - Israel 2000
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
Ahron G. Frenkel (Israeli)
-
Republic of Croatia (Croatian)
-
November 16, 2020
-
July 21, 2021
-
Mónica PINTO (Argentine) - Appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council
-
Stanimir A. ALEXANDROV (Bulgarian) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Zachary DOUGLAS (Australian, Swiss) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Valfor, Geneva, Switzerland
-
Office of the State Attorney, Zagreb, Croatia
Latham & Watkins, Hamburg, Germany, and London, U.K. -
English
-
Pending
-
July 12, 2024 -
Each party files a statement of costs.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
November 16, 2020 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
March 17, 2021 | Following appointment by the Claimant, Stanimir Alexandrov (Bulgarian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
May 11, 2021 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Zachary Douglas (Australian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
July 21, 2021 | Following appointment by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with Article 38 of the ICSID Convention, Mónica Pinto (Argentine) accepts her appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
July 21, 2021 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(b) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Mónica Pinto (Argentine), President, appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with Article 38 of the ICSID Convention; Stanimir A. Alexandrov (Bulgarian), appointed by the Claimant; and Zachary Douglas (Australian), appointed by the Respondent. |
September 6, 2021 | The Tribunal holds a first session by video conference. |
September 14, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
December 17, 2021 | The Claimant files a memorial on the merits. |
January 19, 2022 | The Respondent files a request to suspend the proceeding. |
January 28, 2022 | The Respondent files a request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
January 28, 2022 | The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of January 19, 2022. |
February 7, 2022 | The Respondent files a response to the Claimant’s observations of January 28, 2022. |
February 14, 2022 | The Claimant files further observations on the Respondent’s response of February 7, 2022. |
February 25, 2022 | The Claimant files observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
March 4, 2022 | The Respondent files a reply on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
March 7, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning the Respondent’s request to suspend the proceeding. |
March 11, 2022 | The Claimant files a rejoinder on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
April 26, 2022 | The Tribunal decides on the Respondent’s request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
September 28, 2022 | The Claimant files a request for provisional measures. |
October 21, 2022 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request for provisional measures. |
November 1, 2022 | The Claimant files a response to the Respondent’s observations of October 21, 2022. |
November 11, 2022 | The Respondent files further observations on the Claimant’s request for provisional measures. |
November 28, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning provisional measures. |
May 20, 2024 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
June 12, 2024 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on the impact of the Elitech Award on this proceeding by video conference. |
July 12, 2024 | Each party files a statement of costs. |