Case Details
Orange S.A. v. Republic of Iraq (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/42)
-
Telecommunications enterprise
-
Information & Communication
-
BIT France - Iraq 2010
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
Orange S.A. (French)
-
Republic of Iraq (Iraqi)
-
October 14, 2020
-
July 13, 2021
-
James HOSKING (New Zealand, U.S.) - Appointed by the Parties
-
Horacio A. GRIGERA NAÓN (Argentine) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Claus VON WOBESER (German, Mexican) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Jones Day, Paris, France
-
Prime Minister, Baghdad, Iraq
Debevoise & Plimpton, New York, N.Y., U.S.A. -
English
-
Pending
-
August 19, 2024 - Each party files a submission on costs.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
October 14, 2020 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
December 18, 2020 | Following appointment by the Claimant, Horacio Grigera Naón (Argentine) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
February 11, 2021 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Claus von Wobeser (German/Mexican) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
May 4, 2021 | The Claimant files a request for the Chairman of the Administrative Council to appoint the arbitrator not yet appointed pursuant to Article 38 of the ICSID Convention. |
July 13, 2021 | Following appointment by agreement of the parties James Hosking (U.S., New Zealand) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
July 13, 2021 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(a) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: James Hosking (U.S., New Zealand), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; Horacio Grigera Naón (Argentine), appointed by the Claimant; and Claus von Wobeser (German/Mexican), appointed by the Respondent. |
September 1, 2021 | The President of the Tribunal holds a first session by video conference. |
September 2, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
October 1, 2021 | The Respondent files a request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
October 29, 2021 | The Claimant files observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
January 3, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning the Respondent’s request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
May 3, 2022 | The Claimant files a memorial on the merits. |
September 30, 2022 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits. |
January 13, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 on production of documents. |
June 5, 2023 | The Claimant files a Reply on the Merits and Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction. |
October 7, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 on production of documents. |
October 24, 2023 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and a reply on jurisdiction. |
November 16, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning production of documents. |
December 21, 2023 | The Claimant files a rejoinder on jurisdiction. |
January 11, 2024 | The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by video conference. |
January 16, 2024 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
February 5, 2024 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning procedural matters. |
February 12, 2024 - February 16, 2024 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in Washington D.C. |
April 17, 2024 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning procedural matters. |
May 31, 2024 | Each Party files a post-hearing brief. |
June 28, 2024 | Each party files a reply post hearing brief. |
August 19, 2024 | Each party files a submission on costs. |