The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings.

Following appointment by the Claimant, Charles Poncet (Swiss) accepts his appointment as arbitrator.

Following appointment by the Respondent, August Reinisch (Austrian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator.

Following appointment by agreement of the parties, Christopher Greenwood (British) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator.

The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(a) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Christopher Greenwood (British), President, appointed by the Secretary-General in accordance with the agreement of the Parties; Charles Poncet (Swiss), appointed by the Claimant; and August Reinisch (Austrian), appointed by the Respondent.

The Tribunal holds a first session by video conference.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters.

The Claimant files a memorial on the merits.

The Respondent files a memorial on jurisdiction and a counter-memorial on the merits.

Following exchanges between the parties, the parties file a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning production of documents.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning procedural matters.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning production of documents.

The Claimant files a reply on the merits and a counter-memorial on jurisdiction.

The Respondent files a reply on jurisdiction and rejoinder on the merits.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning procedural matters.

The Claimant files a rejoinder on jurisdiction.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning procedural matters.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning procedural matters.

The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by video conference.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning procedural matters.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of February 9, 2024.

The Tribunal decides on the Claimant’s request of February 9, 2024.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of March 7, 2024.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence and observations to the Respondent’s application of March 11, 2024.

The Tribunal decides on the Parties’ requests of March 7, 2024 and March 12, 2024.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of March 13, 2024. 

The Tribunal rejects the Claimant’s request of March 13, 2024.

The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in person in London and by video conference.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Tribunal decides on the Respondent’s request of March 17, 2024.

The Parties file a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Tribunal decides on the Parties’ request of March 26, 2024.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Tribunal decides on the Claimant’s request of March 27, 2024.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of June 7, 2024, and files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s requests of July 11, 2024, and July 19, 2024.

The Claimant files a response to the Respondent’s observations of August 5, 2024.

The Respondent files further observations on the requests for admissibility of new evidence of July 11, 2024, and July 19, 2024.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 9 concerning the admissibility of new evidence.

Each party files a post-hearing brief.

Each party files a reply post-hearing brief.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of February 3, 2025.

The Respondent files a response to the Claimant’s observations of February 12, 2025.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s response of February 26, 2025.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Tribunal decides on the Respondent’s request of February 3, 2025.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of April 14, 2025. 

The Respondent files a response to the Claimant’s observations of April 28, 2025.

The Tribunal decides on the Respondent’s requests of April 14, 2025 and April 25, 2025.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of June 28, 2025. 

Each party files new evidence.

The Tribunal decides on the Respondent’s request of June 28, 2025.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of July 10, 2025.

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Tribunal decides on the Claimant’s request of July 10, 2025.

Each party files a submission on new evidence. 

The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of October 30, 2025.