Case Details

Akfel Commodities Pte. Ltd. and I-Systems Global B.V. v. Republic of Türkiye (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/36)

Subject of Dispute:

Natural gas and electric power services
Economic Sector:

Oil, Gas & Mining
Instrument(s) Invoked:

BIT Türkiye - Singapore 2008, BIT Netherlands - Türkiye 1986
Applicable Rules:

ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules

(a) Original Proceeding

Claimant(s)/Nationality(ies):

Akfel Commodities Pte. Ltd. (Singaporean), I-Systems Global B.V. (Dutch)
Respondent(s):

Republic of Türkiye (Turkish)
Date Registered:

September 18, 2020
Date of Constitution of Tribunal:

April 22, 2021

Composition of Tribunal

President:

August REINISCH (Austrian) - Appointed by the Parties
Arbitrators:

Oscar M. GARIBALDI (Argentine, U.S.) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Brigitte STERN (French) - Appointed by the Respondent(s)

Party Representatives

Claimant(s):

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer London, U.K. and Paris, France
Respondent(s):

Kollektif Law Firm, Istanbul, Türkiye
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Language(s) of Proceeding:

English
Status of Proceeding:

Pending
Latest Development:

May 25, 2023 - The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and a reply on jurisdiction.

No References Available.

(a) Original Proceeding

Date	Development
September 18, 2020	The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings.
November 4, 2020	Following appointment by the Claimants, Oscar Garibaldi (Argentine/U.S.) accepts his appointment as arbitrator.
January 19, 2021	Following appointment by the Respondent, Brigitte Stern (French) accepts her appointment as arbitrator.
April 22, 2021	Following appointment by agreement of the parties, August Reinisch (Austrian) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator.
April 22, 2021	The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(a) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: August Reinisch (Austrian), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; Oscar Garibaldi (Argentine/U.S.), appointed by the Claimants; and Brigitte Stern (French), appointed by the Respondent.
June 17, 2021	The Tribunal holds a first session by video conference.
June 23, 2021	The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters.
July 15, 2021	Following exchanges between the parties, the Claimants file a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.
July 29, 2021	The Respondent files observations on the Claimants’ request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.
August 9, 2021	The Claimants file a response to the Respondent’s observations of July 29, 2021.
August 16, 2021	The Respondent files further observations on the Claimants’ request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.
August 23, 2021	The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning production of documents.
November 6, 2021	The Claimants file a memorial on the merits.
December 17, 2021	The Respondent files a request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question.
January 21, 2022	The Claimants file observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question.
February 3, 2022	The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning the confidentiality of documents.
February 16, 2022	The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning the Respondent’s request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question; as a result, the objections to jurisdiction are joined to the merits of the dispute.
February 23, 2022	The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning procedural matters.
March 3, 2022	The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning procedural matters.
June 24, 2022	The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and a memorial on jurisdiction.
October 18, 2022	The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning production of documents.
January 9, 2023	The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning production of documents.
January 28, 2023	The Claimants file a reply on the merits and a counter-memorial on jurisdiction.
May 25, 2023	The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and a reply on jurisdiction.
May 25, 2023	The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and a reply on jurisdiction.