Case Details
Artem Skubenko and others v. Republic of North Macedonia (ICSID Case No. ARB/19/9)
-
Mining concession
-
Oil, Gas & Mining
-
BIT Ukraine - North Macedonia 1998
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
Artem Skubenko (Ukrainian), Valentyn Drozdenko (Ukrainian), Anatoliy Semynoga (Ukrainian), Igor Pereverzev (Ukrainian), Artem Kadomskyi (Ukrainian), Igor Kompanets (Ukrainian), Sergii Nadiezhdin (Ukrainian), Volodymyr Skubenko (Ukrainian)
-
Republic of North Macedonia (Macedonian)
-
April 25, 2019
-
September 12, 2019
-
Ali MALEK (British, Iranian) - Appointed by the Parties
-
Stanimir A. ALEXANDROV (Bulgarian) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Jan PAULSSON (French, Swedish) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Omnia Strategy, London, U.K.
Mergul Law, London, U.K.
Lucas Bastin, London, U.K.
Matthieu Grégoire, London, U.K. -
White & Case, New York, NY, U.S.A.
-
English
-
Pending
-
February 7, 2024 - Each party files observations on the other party’s submission on costs.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
April 25, 2019 | The Acting Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
June 14, 2019 | Following appointment by the Claimants, Stanimir Alexandrov (Bulgarian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
July 15, 2019 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Jan Paulsson (French/Swedish) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
September 12, 2019 | Following appointment by agreement of the parties, Ali Malek (British/Iranian) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
September 12, 2019 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(a) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Ali Malek (British/Iranian), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; Stanimir Alexandrov (Bulgarian), appointed by Claimants; and Jan Paulsson (French/Swedish), appointed by Respondent. |
November 1, 2019 | The Tribunal holds a first session by telephone conference. |
November 5, 2019 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
January 23, 2020 | The Respondent files a request for disqualification of counsel. |
January 31, 2020 | The Claimants file observations on the request for disqualification of counsel. |
February 7, 2020 | The Respondent files a reply to Claimants’ observations on the request for disqualification of counsel. |
February 14, 2020 | The Claimants file observations on the Respondent’s reply of February 7, 2020. |
February 21, 2020 | The Tribunal issues a decision on the Respondent’s request for disqualification of counsel. |
March 20, 2020 | The Claimants file a memorial on the merits. |
May 8, 2020 | The Respondent files a request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
June 19, 2020 | The Claimants file observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
July 3, 2020 | The Respondent files further observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
August 12, 2020 | The Tribunal issues a Decision on the Respondent’s request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question; as a result, the objections to jurisdiction are joined to the merits of the dispute. |
January 11, 2021 | The Respondent files a Memorial on Jurisdiction and Counter-Memorial on the Merits. |
March 31, 2021 | Following exchanges between the parties, each party files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
April 20, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning production of documents. |
October 1, 2021 | The Claimants file a reply on the merits and a counter-memorial on jurisdiction. |
December 8, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning the disclosure of documents. |
March 11, 2022 | The Respondent files a Rejoinder on the Merits and Reply on Jurisdiction. |
December 8, 2022 | The Claimants file a rejoinder on jurisdiction. |
June 9, 2023 | The President holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by video conference. |
June 14, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
September 5, 2023 | The Claimants file a request for provisional measures. |
September 11, 2023 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimants’ request for provisional measures. |
September 12, 2023 | The Claimants file a response to the Respondent’s observations of September 11, 2023. |
September 13, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning procedural matters. |
September 18, 2023 | The Respondent files a request for reconsideration of Procedural Order No. 5 dated September 13, 2023. |
September 22, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning the Respondent’s request for reconsideration of Procedural Order No. 5. |
September 22, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning the Claimants’ application for provisional measures. |
October 2, 2023 - October 13, 2023 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in London. |
November 3, 2023 | The Claimants file a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
November 10, 2023 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimants’ request of November 3, 2023. |
November 13, 2023 | The Claimants file a response to the Respondent’s observations of November 10, 2023. |
November 21, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning the admissibility of new evidence. |
November 27, 2023 | Each party files a post-hearing brief. |
January 17, 2024 | Each party files a submission on costs. |
February 7, 2024 | Each party files observations on the other party’s submission on costs. |