Case Details
VC Holding II S.à.r.l. and others v. Italian Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/16/39)
-
Renewable energy generation enterprise
-
Electric Power & Other Energy
-
ECT (Energy Charter Treaty)
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
SolEs XXII Projekt GmbH (German), Enernovum Asset 1 GmbH (German), Foresight Luxembourg Solar 4 S.a.r.l. (Luxembourg), Enernovum GmbH (German), SolEs XXIII Projekt GmbH (German), SolEs XX Projekt GmbH (German), VC Holding II S.a.r.l. (Luxembourg), SolEs Zarasol GmbH (German), SolEs XXI Projekt GmbH (German), Foresight European Solar 2 Ltd. (British), Foresight Luxembourg (VCT) 2 S.a.r.l. (Luxembourg), CIC Renewable Energies Italy GmbH (German)
-
Italian Republic (Italian)
-
December 6, 2016
-
August 4, 2017
-
Klaus REICHERT (German, Irish) - Appointed by Co-Arbitrators
-
Charles PONCET (Swiss) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Brigitte STERN (French) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
King & Spalding, Paris, France, Houston, TX, U.S.A., and Frankfurt, Germany
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Milan and Rome, Italy
Green Horse Legal Advisory, Milan, Italy -
Avvocatura Generale dello Stato, Italian Republic, Rome, Italy
Maria Chiara Malaguti, External Counsel to the Legal Service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Italian Republic, Rome, Italy -
English
-
Concluded
-
October 24, 2025 - The Tribunal renders its award.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
(a) Original Proceeding
Published Decisions
Decision on the Proposal for Disqualification of Arbitrator Dr. Charles Poncet (English;)
(a) Original Proceeding
| Date | Development |
|---|---|
| December 6, 2016 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
| March 3, 2017 | Following appointment by the Claimants, Charles Poncet (Swiss) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
| April 17, 2017 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Brigitte Stern (French) accepts her appointment as arbitrator. |
| August 3, 2017 | Following appointment by his co-arbitrators and approval from the parties, Klaus Reichert (German, Irish) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
| August 4, 2017 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(a) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Klaus Reichert (German, Irish), President, appointed by his co-arbitrators with approval from the parties; Charles Poncet (Swiss), appointed by the Claimants; and Brigitte Stern (French), appointed by the Respondent. |
| September 22, 2017 | The Tribunal holds a first session by telephone conference. |
| October 30, 2017 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
| April 17, 2018 | The Claimants file a memorial on the merits. |
| April 30, 2018 | The Respondent files objections to jurisdiction pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41(1) and a request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
| May 16, 2018 | The Claimants file observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
| June 4, 2018 | The Tribunal issues a decision concerning the Respondent’s request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
| September 14, 2018 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and memorial on jurisdiction, including a request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
| September 26, 2018 | The Claimants file observations on the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
| October 12, 2018 | A non-disputing party files an application pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2). |
| October 18, 2018 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning the Respondent’s request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
| October 23, 2018 | Each party files observations on the non-disputing party’s application. |
| November 5, 2018 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning the non-disputing party’s application pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2). |
| December 19, 2018 | The Claimants file a reply on the merits and a counter-memorial on jurisdiction. |
| March 15, 2019 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and a reply on jurisdiction. |
| May 10, 2019 | The Claimants file a rejoinder on jurisdiction. |
| June 14, 2019 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to suspend the proceeding. |
| June 24, 2019 | The Claimants file observations on the Respondent’s request of June 14, 2019. |
| June 26, 2019 | The Tribunal issues a decision on the Respondent’s request of June 14, 2019. |
| July 22, 2019 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
| August 5, 2019 - August 8, 2019 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in Paris. |
| October 30, 2019 | Each party files a post-hearing brief. |
| December 4, 2019 | Each party files a reply post-hearing brief. |
| December 6, 2019 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| December 12, 2019 | The Claimants file observations on the Respondent’s request of December 9, 2019 and file a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| March 30, 2020 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of a new document. |
| March 30, 2020 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| April 7, 2020 | The Claimants file observations on the Respondent’s request of March 30, 2020. |
| April 9, 2020 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| September 15, 2020 | The Claimants file a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| September 16, 2020 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| September 17, 2020 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| September 18, 2020 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| February 27, 2021 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| March 2, 2021 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| April 30, 2021 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| May 4, 2021 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| September 13, 2021 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| September 17, 2021 | The Claimants file observations on the Respondent’s request of September 13, 2021. |
| September 20, 2021 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| January 12, 2022 | Each party files a submission on costs. |
| October 20, 2022 | The Respondent files a proposal for disqualification of arbitrator Charles Poncet. The proceeding is suspended in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 9(6). |
| November 21, 2022 | The Claimants file observations on the proposal for disqualification. |
| December 6, 2022 | The arbitrator furnishes explanations regarding the proposal for disqualification in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 9(3). |
| December 21, 2022 | Each party files further observations on the proposal for disqualification. |
| January 12, 2023 | The arbitrator furnishes further explanations regarding the proposal for disqualification in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 9(3). |
| January 23, 2023 | Each party files further observations on the proposal for disqualification. |
| April 21, 2023 | The proposal for disqualification of arbitrator Charles Poncet is declined by the co-arbitrators. The proceeding is resumed pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 9(6). |
| May 9, 2024 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| May 13, 2024 | The Claimants file observations on the Respondent’s request of March 11, 2024 and file a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| May 15, 2024 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| June 12, 2024 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| June 20, 2024 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
| February 11, 2025 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning procedural matters. |
| May 5, 2025 | The Tribunal declares the proceeding closed in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 38(1). |
| June 9, 2025 | The Respondent files a request to reopen the proceeding pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 38(2). |
| June 13, 2025 | The Claimants file observations on the request to reopen the proceeding. |
| June 18, 2025 | The Tribunal issues a decision on the Respondent’s request to reopen the proceeding. |
| October 24, 2025 | The Tribunal renders its award. |

