The Respondent files further observations on the Claimants’ response of January 23, 2017.

The Claimants file a response to the Respondent’s observations of January 10, 2017.

The Respondent files a reply to the Claimants’ observations of October 9, 2017.

The Claimants file a rejoinder to the Respondent's reply of October 16, 2017.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question and procedural calendar.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning the procedural calendar.

Following exchanges between the parties, the Claimants file a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Respondent files a request for a separate schedule for supplementary preliminary objections.

The Claimants file observations on the Respondent’s request for a separate schedule for supplementary preliminary objections of April 20, 2018.

The Respondent files a reply on a separate schedule for supplementary preliminary objections.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning production of documents.

The Claimants file a rejoinder on a separate schedule for supplementary preliminary objections.

The Claimants file a request for the Tribunal to order additional document search as part of the document production process.

The Tribunal decides on request for a separate schedule for supplementary preliminary objections.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimants’ request of May 26, 2018.

The Tribunal issues a decision on production of documents.

Following the resignation of arbitrator Francisco Orrego Vicuña, the Secretary-General notifies the parties of the vacancy on the Tribunal and the proceeding is suspended pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 10(2).

The Tribunal consents to the resignation of arbitrator Francisco Orrego Vicuña pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 8(2) and the Secretary-General notifies the parties thereof.

Following the resignation of arbitrator Francisco Orrego Vicuña, David Haigh (Canadian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator, appointed by the Claimants in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 11(1).

The Tribunal is reconstituted. Its members are Laurent Lévy (Brazilian/Swiss), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; David Haigh (Canadian), appointed by the Claimants; and Toby Landau (British), appointed by the Respondent. The proceeding is resumed pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 12.

The Claimants file a reply on the merits and counter-memorial on jurisdiction and counter-claims.

A non-disputing party files an application pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).

Each party files observations on the non-disputing party’s application.

The Tribunal decides on the non-disputing party’s application of November 23, 2018.

The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The non-disputing party files a written submission pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).

The Claimants file observations on the Respondent’s request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.

The Respondent files a reply to the Claimants’ observations of February 22, 2019.

The Claimants file a rejoinder to Respondent’s Reply of March 5, 2019.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning production of documents.

The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and reply on jurisdiction.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 9 concerning procedural matters.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 10 concerning the advances.

The Claimants file a rejoinder on jurisdiction.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 11 concerning procedural matters.

Each party files a submission in relation to the Agreement for the Termination of Bilateral Investment Treaties Between the Member States of the European Union.

Each party files a reply submission in relation to the Agreement for the Termination of Bilateral Investment Treaties Between the Member States of the European Union.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 12 concerning procedural matters.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 13 concerning provisional measures.

The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by telephone conference.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 14 concerning the organization of the hearing.

The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits by video conference.

The hearing on jurisdiction and the merits is adjourned, pursuant to the parties’ agreement.

The Tribunal holds a continuation of the hearing on jurisdiction and the merits by video conference.

The Tribunal holds a continuation of the hearing on jurisdiction and the merits by video conference.

The Tribunal holds a continuation of the hearing on jurisdiction and the merits by video conference.

The Claimants file a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. 

The Respondent files observations on the Claimants’ request of March 22, 2022 and files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. 

The Claimants file a response to the Respondent’s observations and request of March 24, 2022. 

The Respondent files observations on the Respondent’s request of March 24, 2022.

The Claimants file a further response to the Respondent’s request of March 24, 2022. 

The Tribunal issues a decision on the admissibility of new evidence. 

Each party files a post-hearing brief.

The Claimants file a request for provisional measures.

The Respondent files observations on the Claimants’ request for provisional measures.

The Claimants file a reply to the Respondent’s observations of October 6, 2023.

The Respondent files a rejoinder to the Claimants’ reply of October 30, 2023.

The Tribunal issues a decision on provisional measures.

The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 15 concerning provisional measures.