Case Details

Cavalum SGPS, S.A. v. Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/15/34)

Subject of Dispute:

Renewable energy generation enterprise
Economic Sector:

Electric Power & Other Energy
Instrument(s) Invoked:

ECT (Energy Charter Treaty)
Applicable Rules:

ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules

(a) Original Proceeding

Claimant(s)/Nationality(ies):

Cavalum SGPS, S.A. (Portuguese)
Respondent(s):

Kingdom of Spain (Spanish)
Date Registered:

August 4, 2015
Date of Constitution of Tribunal:

January 22, 2016

Composition of Tribunal

President:

Lawrence COLLINS (British) - Appointed by the Parties
Arbitrators:

David R. HAIGH (Canadian) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Daniel BETHLEHEM (British) - Appointed by the Respondent(s)

Party Representatives

Claimant(s):

King & Spalding, Houston, TX, U.S.A.
King & Spalding, Paris, France
Respondent(s):

Abogacía General del Estado, the Ministry of Justice of the Government of Spain
Language(s) of Proceeding:

English,Spanish
Status of Proceeding:

Pending
Latest Development:

January 22, 2020 - The Tribunal decides on the Respondent’s request of December 4 and on the Claimant’s request of December 10, 2019 .

No References Available.

(a) Original Proceeding

Date	Development
August 4, 2015	The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings.
October 28, 2015	Following appointment by the Claimant, David Haigh (Canadian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator.
November 14, 2015	Following appointment by the Respondent, Daniel Bethlehem (British) accepts his appointment as arbitrator.
January 22, 2016	Following appointment by the parties, Lawrence Collins (British) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator.
March 18, 2016	The Tribunal holds a first session by telephone conference.
April 18, 2016	A non-disputing party files an application pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).
May 5, 2016	The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters.
May 6, 2016	Each party files observations on the non-disputing party’s application.
May 20, 2016	The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 on the non-disputing party’s application to file a written submission pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).
July 25, 2016	The Claimant files a memorial on the merits.
October 28, 2016	The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and a memorial on jurisdiction.
November 25, 2016	Each party files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents.
January 13, 2017	The Tribunal rules on the parties’ document production requests.
January 17, 2017	A non-disputing party files an application pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).
January 30, 2017	The Claimant files observations on the non-disputing party’s application.
January 31, 2017	The Respondent files observations on the non-disputing party’s application.
February 21, 2017	The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning the non-disputing party’s application.
March 28, 2017	The Claimant files a reply memorial on the merits and a counter-memorial on jurisdiction.
April 28, 2017	The non-disputing party files a written submission pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2).
June 2, 2017	The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and a reply on jurisdiction.
July 7, 2017	The Claimant files a rejoinder on jurisdiction and its observations on the non-disputing party’s written submission.
February 1, 2018	The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by telephone conference.
February 2, 2018	The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning the organization of the hearing.
March 12, 2018 - March 16, 2018	The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in London.
May 16, 2018	The non-disputing party files a communication regarding its written submission of April 28, 2017.
May 28, 2018	Each Party files observations on the non-disputing party’s communication of May 16, 2018.
June 12, 2018	The Tribunal issues a decision concerning the non-disputing party’s communication of May 16, 2018.
June 22, 2018	The non-disputing party files a written submission updating its written submission of April 28, 2017.
June 28, 2018	The Tribunal holds a videoconference in continuation of the hearing.
September 18, 2018	Each party files a post-hearing brief.
January 25, 2019	The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of a new document.
February 4, 2019	The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of January 25, 2019, and files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of a new document.
February 4, 2019	The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of a new document.
February 12, 2019	The Tribunal decides on the Respondent’s request of January 28 and on the Claimant’s request of February 4, 2019.
December 4, 2019	The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new documents.
December 10, 2019	The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of December 4, 2019, and files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new documents.
January 10, 2020	The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of December 10, 2019.
January 22, 2020	The Tribunal decides on the Respondent’s request of December 4 and on the Claimant’s request of December 10, 2019 .