Case Details
Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No. ARB/11/12)
-
Construction of an airport terminal
-
Transportation
-
BIT Germany - Philippines 1997
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide (German)
-
Republic of the Philippines (Philippine)
-
April 27, 2011
-
February 7, 2012
-
Piero BERNARDINI (Italian) - Appointed by the Parties
-
Stanimir A. ALEXANDROV (Bulgarian) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Albert Jan VAN DEN BERG (Dutch) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
-
Florentino P. Feliciano, Makai City, Philippines
Office of the Solicitor General of the Philippines, Makati City, Philippines
White & Case, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. -
English
-
Concluded
-
December 10, 2014 - The Tribunal renders its award.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
April 27, 2011 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
June 27, 2011 | Following appointment by the Claimant, Stanimir Alexandrov (Bulgarian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
July 29, 2011 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Albert Jan van den Berg (Dutch) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
February 6, 2012 | Following appointment by the parties, Piero Bernardini (Italian) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
February 7, 2012 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(a) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Piero Bernardini (Italian), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; Stanimir A. Alexandrov (Bulgarian), appointed by the Claimant; and Albert Jan van den Berg (Dutch), appointed by the Respondent. |
April 3, 2012 | The Tribunal holds a first session in Washington, D.C. |
April 18, 2012 | The Respondent files a written submission on preliminary matters. |
May 2, 2012 | The Claimant files a written response to the Respondent's submission on preliminary matters of April 18, 2012. |
May 17, 2012 | The Tribunal issues a Procedural Order No. 1 concerning preliminary matters. |
August 17, 2012 | The Claimant files a memorial on liability. |
November 19, 2012 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and a memorial on jurisdiction, including counter-claims. |
January 7, 2013 | The parties file requests for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
January 18, 2013 | The Tribunal issues a decision on production of documents. |
April 5, 2013 | The Claimant files a reply on the merits and a counter-memorial on jurisdiction, including counter-claims. |
May 13, 2013 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
May 17, 2013 | The Claimant files observations on the Respondent's request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
June 5, 2013 | Following several rounds of written submissions exchanged between the parties, the Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning production of documents. |
June 10, 2013 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and a reply on jurisdiction, including counter-claims. |
July 12, 2013 | The Claimant files a rejoinder on jurisdiction, including counter-claims. |
August 20, 2013 | The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by telephone conference. |
August 30, 2013 | The Tribunal decides on the organization of the hearing. |
September 2, 2013 | The Tribunal decides on the organization of the hearing. |
September 2, 2013 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
September 6, 2013 | The Tribunal decides on the organization of the hearing. |
September 12, 2013 | The Tribunal decides on the organization of the hearing. |
September 16, 2013 - September 26, 2013 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction, liability, and counter-claims in Washington, D.C. |
September 27, 2013 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning procedural matters and the procedural calendar. |
October 24, 2013 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning procedural matters. |
January 17, 2014 | Each party files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
January 22, 2014 | The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of January 17, 2014. |
January 24, 2014 | The Respondent files a response to the Claimant’s observations of January 22, 2014. The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
March 3, 2014 | Each party files a post-hearing brief. |
March 12, 2014 | The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
March 17, 2014 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of March 12, 2014. |
March 19, 2014 | The Respondent files further observations on the Claimant’s request of March 12, 2014. |
March 20, 2014 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
April 2, 2014 | Each party files a reply post-hearing brief. |
April 14, 2014 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
April 21, 2014 | The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of April 14, 2014. |
April 22, 2014 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
May 2, 2014 | Each party files a submission on costs. |
May 19, 2014 | Each party files observations on the other party's submission on costs. |
June 6, 2014 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
June 9, 2014 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
September 9, 2014 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
September 15, 2014 | The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of September 9, 2014. |
September 16, 2014 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new evidence. |
December 10, 2014 | The Tribunal renders its award. |