Case Details
Metal-Tech Ltd. v. Republic of Uzbekistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/3)
-
Molybdenum plant
-
Other Industry
-
BIT Israel - Uzbekistan 1994
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
Metal-Tech Ltd. (Israeli)
-
Republic of Uzbekistan (Uzbek)
-
February 4, 2010
-
June 28, 2010
-
Gabrielle KAUFMANN-KOHLER (Swiss) - Appointed by the Parties
-
John M. TOWNSEND (U.S.) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Claus VON WOBESER (Mexican) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
-
Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
White & Case, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. -
English
-
Concluded
-
October 4, 2013 - The Tribunal declares the proceeding closed in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 38(1).
The Tribunal renders its award.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
February 4, 2010 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
June 28, 2010 | The Tribunal is constituted. Its members are: Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler (Swiss), President; John Townsend (U.S.); and Claus von Wobeser (Mexican). |
August 3, 2010 | The Tribunal holds a first session by telephone conference. |
November 11, 2010 | The Respondent files a memorial on jurisdiction, admissibility and bifurcation. |
February 11, 2011 | The Claimant files a statement of claim and a counter-memorial on jurisdiction and bifurcation. |
February 24, 2011 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on the Respondent's request to address its objections to jurisdiction and admissibility as a preliminary question. |
March 8, 2011 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning the Respondent’s request to address its objections to jurisdiction and admissibility as a preliminary question. |
June 2, 2011 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and a reply on jurisdiction. |
July 14, 2011 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning production of documents. |
September 9, 2011 | The Claimant files a reply on the merits and a rejoinder on jurisdiction. |
November 23, 2011 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits. |
December 7, 2011 | The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by telephone conference. |
December 13, 2011 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning production of documents, the procedural calendar, and the organization of the hearing on jurisdiction and merits. |
December 22, 2011 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning production of documents and examination of witnesses. |
January 13, 2012 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning the PCA’s review of documents, production of documents, and confidentiality. |
January 15, 2012 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning the organization of the hearing on jurisdiction and merits. |
January 23, 2012 - January 28, 2012 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and merits in Washington, D.C. |
February 10, 2012 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning production of documents and post-hearing briefing. |
March 13, 2012 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning production of documents. |
April 2, 2012 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 9 concerning confidentiality. |
April 17, 2012 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 10 concerning the admissibility of evidence and production of documents. |
May 21, 2012 | The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by telephone conference. |
May 22, 2012 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 11 concerning certain requests and the organization of the hearing. |
May 29, 2012 | The Tribunal holds an additional hearing in Washington, D.C. |
June 18, 2012 | Each party files a post-hearing brief. |
July 12, 2012 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 12 concerning the admissibility of evidence. |
August 2, 2012 | Each party files a reply post-hearing brief. |
August 22, 2012 | Each party files a reply submission on costs. |
October 4, 2013 | The Tribunal declares the proceeding closed in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 38(1). The Tribunal renders its award. |