Case Details
Opic Karimum Corporation v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/14)
-
Oil exploration and production
-
Oil, Gas & Mining
-
Investment Law - Venezuela (1999)
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
Opic Karimum Corporation (Panamanian)
-
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (Venezuelan)
-
June 16, 2010
-
January 5, 2011
-
Doug JONES (Australian, Irish) - Appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council
-
Philippe SANDS (British, French, Mauritian) - Appointed by the Respondent(s)
Guido Santiago TAWIL (Argentine, Portuguese) - Appointed by the Claimant(s) -
K&L Gates, Taipei, Taiwan
McDermott Will& Emery Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater, Frankfurt, Germany
McDermott Will& Emery, Washington D.C., U.S.A. -
Curtis Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, New York, NY, U.S.A.
Procuraduría General de la República, Caracas, Venezuela -
English,Spanish
-
Concluded
-
May 28, 2013 - The Tribunal renders its award; attached to the award is a dissenting opinion by arbitrator Guido Santiago Tawil.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
(a) Original Proceeding
Published Decisions
Award of the Tribunal
Dissenting Opinion of Professor Dr. Guido Santiago Tawil
Available on the ICSID Website
Award of the Tribunal (May 28, 2013) English (Original); Spanish (Original)
Dissenting Opinion of Professor Dr. Guido Santiago Tawil (May 28, 2013) English (Original); Spanish (Original)
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
June 16, 2010 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
January 5, 2011 | The Tribunal is constituted. Its members are: Doug Jones (Australian/Irish), President; Philippe Sands (British/French); and Guido Santiago Tawil (Argentine). |
January 17, 2011 | The Claimants file a proposal for disqualification of an arbitrator; the proceeding is suspended. |
February 4, 2011 | The Respondent files observations on Claimants' proposal for the disqualification of an arbitrator. |
February 17, 2011 | The arbitrator furnishes explanations in regard to the proposal for disqualification in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 9(3). |
March 9, 2011 | The Claimant files further observations on the proposal for disqualification of an arbitrator. |
May 5, 2011 | The proposal for disqualification of an arbitrator is declined; the proceeding is resumed. |
July 12, 2011 | The Tribunal holds a first session in Paris. |
August 1, 2011 | The Respondent files a memorial on jurisdiction. |
August 22, 2011 | The Claimant files a request for production of documents. |
August 29, 2011 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request for production of documents. |
September 5, 2011 | The Claimant files a response to the Respondent’s observations of August 29, 2011. |
September 19, 2011 | The Tribunal issues a procedural order concerning production of documents. |
November 1, 2011 | The Claimant files a counter-memorial on jurisdiction. |
January 31, 2012 | The Respondent files a reply on jurisdiction. |
April 30, 2012 | The Claimant files a rejoinder on jurisdiction. |
May 21, 2012 | The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by telephone conference. |
June 18, 2012 - June 20, 2012 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction in Washington, D.C. |
May 28, 2013 | The Tribunal renders its award; attached to the award is a dissenting opinion by arbitrator Guido Santiago Tawil. |