Case Details
GRAND EXPRESS Non-Public Joint Stock Company v. Republic of Belarus (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/18/1)
-
Railcar manufacturing plant
-
Other Industry
-
Agreement for Encouragement and Mutual Protection of Investments in the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Community (2008) , Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union (2014)
-
ICSID Additional Facility - Arbitration Rules
-
GRAND EXPRESS Non-Public Joint Stock Company (Russian)
-
Republic of Belarus (Belarussian)
-
January 31, 2018
-
August 10, 2018
-
Laurent LÉVY (Brazilian, Swiss) - Appointed by the Parties
-
Stanimir A. ALEXANDROV (Bulgarian) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
J. Christopher THOMAS (Canadian) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Rybalkin, Gortsunyan & Partners, Moscow, Russian Federation
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, London, U.K., New York and Washington, D.C., U.S.A. -
White & Case, London, U.K. and Moscow, Russian Federation
Goretsky and Partners, Minsk, Belarus -
English
-
Concluded
-
January 25, 2024 - The Tribunal renders its award.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
January 31, 2018 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
May 4, 2018 | Following appointment by the Claimant, Stanimir Alexandrov (Bulgarian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
May 4, 2018 | Following appointment by the Respondent, J. Christopher Thomas (Canadian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
August 10, 2018 | Following appointment by agreement of the parties, Laurent Lévy (Brazilian/Swiss) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
August 10, 2018 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 6(3) of the ICSID Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules. Its members are: Laurent Lévy (Brazilian/Swiss), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; Stanimir Alexandrov (Bulgarian), appointed by the Claimant; and J. Christopher Thomas (Canadian), appointed by the Respondent. |
October 3, 2018 | The Tribunal holds a first session by telephone conference. |
October 5, 2018 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
February 5, 2019 | The Claimant files a memorial on the merits. |
June 14, 2019 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and a memorial on jurisdiction. |
September 9, 2019 | Following exchanges between the parties, each party files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
September 23, 2019 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning production of documents. |
February 5, 2020 | The Claimant files a reply on the merits and a counter-memorial on jurisdiction. |
February 13, 2020 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning confidentiality. |
July 14, 2020 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits. |
August 29, 2020 | The Claimant files a response to the Respondent’s rejoinder on the merits. |
September 20, 2020 | The Tribunal holds a case management meeting by video conference. |
November 11, 2020 | The Claimant files a request for provisional measures and a request for the Tribunal to decide on confidentiality of documents. |
December 7, 2020 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s requests of November 11, 2020. |
December 28, 2020 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning provisional measures and the confidentiality of documents. |
February 19, 2021 | The Claimant files a memorial on quantum. |
May 25, 2021 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on quantum. |
July 20, 2021 | The Claimant files a reply on quantum. |
September 18, 2021 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on quantum. |
December 8, 2021 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence and production of documents. |
December 20, 2021 | The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of December 8, 2021. |
December 30, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning the admissibility of new evidence and production of documents. |
January 17, 2022 | The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by video conference. |
January 20, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
February 7, 2022 - February 21, 2022 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction, the merits and quantum by video conference. |
March 9, 2022 | The Claimant files a memorial on the additional claim. |
May 7, 2022 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the additional claim. |
May 15, 2022 | The Claimant files a reply on the additional claim. |
May 23, 2022 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on the additional claim. |
May 30, 2022 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on the additional claim in Washington, D.C. and by video conference. |
August 19, 2022 | Each party files a post-hearing brief. |
September 22, 2022 | Each party files a submission on costs. |
October 20, 2022 | Each party files observations on the other party’s submission on costs. |
January 4, 2024 | The Tribunal declares the proceeding closed in accordance with Article 44(1) of the Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules. |
January 25, 2024 | The Tribunal renders its award. |