Case Details
América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V. v. Republic of Colombia (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/16/5)
-
Telecommunications enterprise
-
Information & Communication
-
FTA México-Colombia
-
ICSID Additional Facility - Arbitration Rules
-
América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V. (Mexican)
-
Republic of Colombia (Colombian)
-
October 3, 2016
-
July 7, 2017
-
Luca G. RADICATI DI BROZOLO (British, Italian) - Appointed by the Secretary-General
-
José A. MARTÍNEZ DE HOZ (Argentine) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Rodrigo OREAMUNO (Costa Rican) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Aziz & Kaye, Mexico City, Mexico
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Lloreda, Camacho & Co., Bogota, Colombia -
Dechert, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. and Paris, France
Agencia Nacional de Defensa Jurídica del Estado
Prof. Pierre Mayer, Paris, France -
Spanish
-
Concluded
-
May 7, 2021 - The Tribunal renders its award; attached to the award is a dissenting opinion by arbitrator José A. Martínez de Hoz.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
October 3, 2016 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
December 14, 2016 | Following appointment by the Claimant, José A. Martínez de Hoz (h.) (Argentine) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
January 4, 2017 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Rodrigo Oreamuno (Costa Rican) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
July 7, 2017 | Following appointment by the Secretary-General pursuant to the parties’ agreement, Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo (British/Italian), accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
July 7, 2017 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 6(3) of the Additional Facility Rules. Its members are: Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo (British/Italian), President, appointed by the Secretary-General pursuant to the parties' agreement; José A. Martínez de Hoz (Argentine), appointed by the Claimant; and Rodrigo Oreamuno Blanco (Costa Rican), appointed by the Respondent. |
September 11, 2017 | The Tribunal holds a first session by telephone conference. |
September 13, 2017 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
December 20, 2017 | The Claimant files a memorial on the merits. |
February 6, 2018 | The Respondent files a request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
March 12, 2018 | The Claimant files a response to the request to address the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question. |
April 11, 2018 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning the objections to jurisdiction as a preliminary question and procedural calendar. |
May 23, 2018 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 on a modified timetable. |
July 30, 2018 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and memorial on jurisdiction. |
August 21, 2018 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning the procedural calendar. |
October 10, 2018 | Following exchanges between the parties, the Parties file a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
November 14, 2018 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning production of documents. |
April 6, 2019 | The Claimant files a reply on the merits and counter-memorial on jurisdiction. |
August 5, 2019 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits and reply on jurisdiction. |
October 4, 2019 | The Claimant files a rejoinder on jurisdiction. |
October 16, 2019 | The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by telephone conference. |
October 22, 2019 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
October 28, 2019 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new documents. |
November 1, 2019 | The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request of October 28, 2019. |
November 3, 2019 | The Respondent files a response to the Claimant’s observations of November 1, 2019. |
November 5, 2019 | The Tribunal decides on the admissibility of new documents. |
November 17, 2019 - November 22, 2019 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction and the merits in Washington D.C. |
March 2, 2020 | Each party files a post-hearing brief. |
April 24, 2020 | Each party files a statement of costs. |
February 22, 2021 | The Tribunal declares the proceeding closed in accordance with Article 44(1) of the ICSID Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules. |
May 7, 2021 | The Tribunal renders its award; attached to the award is a dissenting opinion by arbitrator José A. Martínez de Hoz. |