Case Details
EnviroGold (Las Lagunas) Limited v. Dominican Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/20/1)
-
Tailings dam
-
Oil, Gas & Mining
-
Contract
-
ICSID Additional Facility - Arbitration Rules
-
EnviroGold (Las Lagunas) Limited (Australian)
-
Dominican Republic (Dominican)
-
April 2, 2020
-
August 5, 2020
-
David ARIAS (Spanish) - Appointed by Co-Arbitrators
-
Henry BURNETT (U.S.) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Guido Santiago TAWIL (Argentine, Portuguese) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Lalive, London, U.K.
-
Consultoría Jurídica del Poder Ejecutivo, Santo Domingo, República Dominicana
Latham & Watkins, Paris, France -
English,Spanish
-
Concluded
-
April 24, 2024 - The Tribunal renders its award.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
April 2, 2020 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
April 24, 2020 | Following appointment by the Claimant, Henry Burnett (U.S.) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
July 6, 2020 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Guido Santiago Tawil (Argentine/Portuguese) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
August 5, 2020 | Following appointment by his co-arbitrators, David Arias (Spanish) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
August 5, 2020 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 13 of the Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules. Its members are: David Arias (Spain), President, appointed by his co-arbitrators; Henry Burnett (U.S.), appointed by the Claimant; and Guido Santiago Tawil (Argentine/Portuguese), appointed by the Respondent. |
September 17, 2020 | The Tribunal holds a first session by video conference. |
October 7, 2020 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
January 15, 2021 | The Claimant files a memorial on the merits. |
February 15, 2021 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
February 26, 2021 | The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
March 3, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning production of documents. |
April 15, 2021 | The Respondent files a memorial on jurisdiction. |
July 14, 2021 | The Claimant files a counter-memorial on jurisdiction. |
August 25, 2021 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
September 1, 2021 | The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
September 2, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning production of documents. |
September 21, 2021 | The Respondent files a reply on jurisdiction. |
November 22, 2021 | The Claimant files a rejoinder on jurisdiction. |
December 2, 2021 | The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by video conference. |
December 9, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
December 21, 2021 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on jurisdiction by videoconference. |
February 3, 2022 | Each party files a statement of costs. |
March 1, 2022 | The Tribunal issues a decision on objections to jurisdiction; attached to the decision is the dissenting opinion by arbitrator Prof. Dr. Guido Santiago Tawil. |
July 15, 2022 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits. |
September 2, 2022 | Following exchanges between the parties, each party files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
September 14, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning production of documents. |
November 4, 2022 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
November 11, 2022 | The Claimant files observations on the Respondent’s request for the Tribunal to decide on production of documents. |
November 25, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning production of documents. |
December 15, 2022 | The Claimant files a reply on the merits. |
March 10, 2023 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits. |
April 11, 2023 | The Tribunal holds a pre-hearing organizational meeting with the parties by video conference. |
April 20, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
May 31, 2023 | The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
June 1, 2023 | The Tribunal decides on the Claimant’s request of May 31, 2023. |
June 1, 2023 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of May 31, 2023. |
June 2, 2023 | The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
June 2, 2023 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of June 2, 2023. |
June 3, 2023 | The Tribunal decides on the Claimant’s request of June 2, 2023. |
June 7, 2023 | The Claimant files two requests for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
June 7, 2023 | The Respondent submits oral observations during the hearing on the Claimant’s requests of June 7, 2023. |
June 7, 2023 | The Tribunal decides on the Claimant’s requests of June 7, 2023. |
June 8, 2023 | The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
June 8, 2023 | The Claimant submits oral observations during the hearing on the Respondent’s request of June 8, 2023. |
June 8, 2023 | The Tribunal decides on the Respondent’s request of June 8, 2023. |
June 5, 2023 - June 8, 2023 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on the merits in person in Washington, D.C. and by video conference. |
August 2, 2023 | Each party files a statement of costs. |
August 9, 2023 | Each party files observations on the other party’s statement of costs. |
January 25, 2024 | The Tribunal declares the proceeding closed in accordance with Article 44(1) of the Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules. |
April 24, 2024 | The Tribunal renders its award. |