Case Details
Mobile TeleSystems OJSC v. Republic of Uzbekistan (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/7)
-
Telecommunications enterprise
-
Information & Communication
-
Investment Law - Uzbekistan (1998)
-
ICSID Additional Facility - Arbitration Rules
-
Mobile TeleSystems OJSC (Russian)
-
Republic of Uzbekistan (Uzbek)
-
November 15, 2012
-
August 29, 2013
-
Gavan GRIFFITH (Australian) - Appointed by the Parties
-
W. Michael REISMAN (U.S.) - Appointed by the Respondent(s)
Albert Jan VAN DEN BERG (Dutch) - Appointed by the Claimant(s) -
Debevoise & Plimpton, London, U.K.
-
Boies, Schiller & Flexner, Miami, FL, U.S.A.
-
English
-
Concluded
-
November 14, 2014 - The Tribunal issues a procedural order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to Article 49(1) of the Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
November 15, 2012 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
March 8, 2013 | Following appointment by the Claimant, Albert Jan van den Berg (Dutch) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
April 18, 2013 | Following appointment by the Respondent, W. Michael Reisman (U.S.) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
August 29, 2013 | Following appointment by the parties, Gavan Griffith (Australian) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 6(3) of the ICSID Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules. Its members are: Gavan Griffith (Australian), President, appointed by the Secretary-General pursuant to the parties' agreement; Michael Reisman (U.S.), appointed by the Respondent; and Albert Jan van den Berg (Dutch) appointed by the Claimant. |
September 27, 2013 | The Respondent files preliminary objections pursuant to Article 45(6) of the Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules. |
October 21, 2013 | The Claimant files observations on the Respondent's preliminary objections pursuant to Article 45(6) of the Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules. |
November 11, 2013 | The Tribunal holds a first session and a hearing on preliminary objections in Washington, D.C. |
November 14, 2013 | The Tribunal issues a decision on the Respondent's preliminary objections pursuant to Article 45(6) of the Arbitration (Additional Facilities) Rules. |
November 20, 2013 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
December 13, 2013 | The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on confidentiality of documents. The Respondent files a request for the Tribunal to decide on confidentiality of documents. |
December 30, 2013 | The Claimant files observations on the Respondent's request of December 13, 2013. The Respondent files observations on the Claimant's request of December 13, 2013. |
January 13, 2014 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning confidentiality. |
April 22, 2014 | The proceeding is suspended, pursuant to the parties' agreement. The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning a stay of proceedings. |
October 15, 2014 | The parties file a request for the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to Article 49(1) of the Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules. |
November 14, 2014 | The Tribunal issues a procedural order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding pursuant to Article 49(1) of the Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules. |