Case Details
Finetis SARL and Finetis Maroc SA v. Kingdom of Morocco (ICSID Case No. ARB/21/44)
-
Telecommunication network
-
Information & Communication
-
BIT Morocco - France 1996
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
Finetis SARL (French), Finetis Maroc SA (Moroccan)
-
Kingdom of Morocco (Moroccan)
-
September 20, 2021
-
February 8, 2022
-
Bernard HANOTIAU (Belgian) - Appointed by the Parties
-
Fernando MANTILLA-SERRANO (Colombian) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Laurence BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES (French, Swiss) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Medici, Paris, France
-
Bredin Prat, Paris, France
Agence Judiciaire du Royaume, Morocco -
French
-
Pending
-
July 25, 2023 -
The Claimants file a reply on the merits.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
September 20, 2021 | The Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
December 2, 2021 | Following appointment by the Claimants, Fernando Mantilla-Serrano (Colombian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
January 6, 2022 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Laurence Boisson de Chazournes (French/Swiss) accepts her appointment as arbitrator. |
February 8, 2022 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(a) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Bernard Hanotiau (Belgian), President, appointed by agreement of the parties; Fernando Mantilla-Serrano (Colombian), appointed by the Claimants; and Laurence Boisson de Chazournes (French/Swiss), appointed by the Respondent. |
February 8, 2022 | Following appointment by agreement of the parties Bernard Hanotiau (Belgian) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
March 15, 2022 | The Tribunal holds a first session by video conference. |
March 22, 2022 | A non-disputing party files an application to file a written submission pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2). |
March 22, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
March 25, 2022 | The Claimants file a proposal for disqualification of Respondent’s counsel. |
April 1, 2022 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimants’ proposal of March 25, 2022. |
April 8, 2022 | The Claimants file a response to the Respondent’s observations of April 1, 2022. |
April 8, 2022 | Each party files observations on the non-disputing party’s application. |
April 15, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning the non-disputing party’s application of March 22, 2022. |
April 15, 2022 | The Respondent files a response to the Claimants’ observations of April 8, 2022. |
April 20, 2022 | The Tribunal holds a hearing by videoconference on the Claimants’ proposal for disqualification of Respondent’s counsel. |
May 4, 2022 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning the Claimants’ proposal for disqualification of Respondent’s counsel. |
July 22, 2022 | The Claimants file a memorial on the merits. |
February 11, 2023 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits. |
May 2, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning production of documents. |
May 11, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning production of documents. |
June 6, 2023 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning production of documents. |
July 25, 2023 | The Claimants file a reply on the merits. |