Case Details
Future Pipe International B.V. v. Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/17/31)
-
Pipe manufacturing enterprise
-
Water, Sanitation & Flood Protection
-
BIT Netherlands - Egypt, Arab Republic of 1996
-
ICSID Convention - Arbitration Rules
-
Future Pipe International B.V. (Dutch)
-
Arab Republic of Egypt (Egyptian)
-
August 24, 2017
-
February 9, 2018
-
Joongi KIM (Korean) - Appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council
-
Michael C. PRYLES (Australian) - Appointed by the Claimant(s)
Laurence BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES (French, Swiss) - Appointed by the Respondent(s) -
Eversheds Sutherland, New York, NY, U.S.A., and London, U.K.
-
Derains & Gharavi, Paris, France
Egyptian State Lawsuits Authority, Giza, Arab Republic of Egypt -
English
-
Pending
-
April 2, 2021 - The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 13 concerning the admissibility of new evidence.
(a) Original Proceeding
Composition of Tribunal
Party Representatives
No References Available.
(a) Original Proceeding
Date | Development |
---|---|
August 24, 2017 | The Acting Secretary-General registers a request for the institution of arbitration proceedings. |
October 25, 2017 | Following appointment by the Claimant, Michael Pryles (Australian) accepts his appointment as arbitrator. |
November 27, 2017 | Following appointment by the Respondent, Laurence Boisson de Chazournes (French/Swiss) accepts her appointment as arbitrator. |
February 9, 2018 | Following appointment by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with Article 38 of the ICSID Convention, Joongi Kim (Korean) accepts his appointment as presiding arbitrator. |
February 9, 2018 | The Tribunal is constituted in accordance with Article 37(2)(b) of the ICSID Convention. Its members are: Joongi Kim (Korean), President, appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council in accordance with Article 38 of the ICSID Convention; Michael Pryles (Australian), appointed by the Claimants; and Laurence Boisson de Chazournes (French/Swiss), appointed by the Respondent. |
April 2, 2018 | The Tribunal holds a first session by telephone conference. |
April 17, 2018 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 1 concerning procedural matters. |
May 4, 2018 | The Claimant files a memorial on the merits. |
August 9, 2018 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 2 concerning the procedural calendar. |
November 5, 2018 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 3 concerning the procedural calendar. |
March 6, 2019 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 4 concerning the procedural calendar. |
May 28, 2019 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 5 concerning the procedural calendar. |
August 14, 2019 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 6 concerning the procedural calendar. |
November 25, 2019 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 7 concerning the procedural calendar. |
December 18, 2019 | The Respondent files a counter-memorial on the merits and memorial on jurisdiction. |
February 19, 2020 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 8 concerning production of documents. |
June 15, 2020 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 9 concerning the procedural calendar. |
June 15, 2020 | The Claimant files a reply memorial on the merits. |
July 6, 2020 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 10 concerning procedural matters and the procedural calendar. |
September 16, 2020 | The Respondent files a rejoinder on the merits. |
September 18, 2020 | The Respondent files a supplement on quantum to the rejoinder on the merits. |
October 19, 2020 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 12 concerning the organization of the hearing. |
December 5, 2020 - December 11, 2020 | The Tribunal holds a hearing on the merits and damages by video conference. |
March 19, 2021 | Each party files a post-hearing brief. |
March 19, 2021 | The Claimant files a request for the Tribunal to decide on the admissibility of new evidence. |
March 26, 2021 | The Respondent files observations on the Claimant’s request of March 19, 2021. |
April 2, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 13 concerning new evidence. |
April 2, 2021 | The Tribunal issues Procedural Order No. 13 concerning the admissibility of new evidence. |